Free Essays on The Effects Of The U.S. Supreme Court On Todays Sociopolitical Structure

The United States Supreme Court has been endowed by the Constitution the duty to ensure that each American receives "the blessings of liberty." Through the years, the Court has both honored and broken that promise. The reason for this seems to be that the High Court may view some legislation as being "necessary and proper" functions of the government so long as it does not violate individual rights expressly stated within the Constitution. The few previously chosen as Justices have been accosted with the responsibility to assess requests for changes within the American social political structure. There seem to be reemerging issues which the Court must refine due to a recent demand of the American people to do so, these issues including relations among races, the right to privacy, and the freedom of expression. With each decision passed down by the High Court, a bit of America's civic and societal culture is altered. The status of today's social world has vastly been affected by the r ulings of the Supreme Court and America owes in part what it is today because of the rulings and their affects of cases to be later mentioned. When the Constitution was instituted in 1789, the Supreme Court's role was not fully understood. In the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Court declared the Judiciary Act of 1789, which allots them the power to order officials to carry out their duties, unconstitutional (Irons 105). Therefore, this case is largely credited with setting the precedent of judicial review. But according to Peter Irons, in his book A People's History of the Supreme Court, this principle was not groundbreaking: " The doctrine of judicial review had been stated by several Framers of the Constitution in 1787, was refined in The Federalist Papers during the ratification debates, and was forcefully restated by Justice Paterson in 1795, when he wrote in a circuit court decision that 'every act of the legislature repugnant to the Consti... Free Essays on The Effects Of The U.S. Supreme Court On Today's Sociopolitical Structure Free Essays on The Effects Of The U.S. Supreme Court On Today's Sociopolitical Structure The United States Supreme Court has been endowed by the Constitution the duty to ensure that each American receives "the blessings of liberty." Through the years, the Court has both honored and broken that promise. The reason for this seems to be that the High Court may view some legislation as being "necessary and proper" functions of the government so long as it does not violate individual rights expressly stated within the Constitution. The few previously chosen as Justices have been accosted with the responsibility to assess requests for changes within the American social political structure. There seem to be reemerging issues which the Court must refine due to a recent demand of the American people to do so, these issues including relations among races, the right to privacy, and the freedom of expression. With each decision passed down by the High Court, a bit of America's civic and societal culture is altered. The status of today's social world has vastly been affected by the r ulings of the Supreme Court and America owes in part what it is today because of the rulings and their affects of cases to be later mentioned. When the Constitution was instituted in 1789, the Supreme Court's role was not fully understood. In the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Court declared the Judiciary Act of 1789, which allots them the power to order officials to carry out their duties, unconstitutional (Irons 105). Therefore, this case is largely credited with setting the precedent of judicial review. But according to Peter Irons, in his book A People's History of the Supreme Court, this principle was not groundbreaking: " The doctrine of judicial review had been stated by several Framers of the Constitution in 1787, was refined in The Federalist Papers during the ratification debates, and was forcefully restated by Justice Paterson in 1795, when he wrote in a circuit court decision that 'every act of the legislature repugnant to the Consti...